Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
This week your student will work with scatter plots. Scatter plots show us how two different variables are related. In this example, each plotted point corresponds to a dog, and its coordinates tell us the height and weight of that dog. The point on the lower left of the graph, for example, might represent a dog that is 8 inches tall and weighs about 5 pounds. The plot shows that, generally speaking, taller dogs weigh more than shorter dogs.
Since a larger value for one characteristic (height) generally means a larger value for the other characteristic (weight), we say that there is a positive association between dog height and dog weight.
In the next example, each point corresponds to a car, and its coordinates tell us the weight (kilograms) and fuel efficiency (miles per gallon) of the car.
This time, we see that larger values for one characteristic (car weight) generally go along with lower values for the other characteristic (fuel efficiency), and so we say that there is a negative association between car weight and fuel efficiency.
Here is a task to try with your student:
This scatter plot shows the relationship between average temperature and gas usage in a building.
Solution:
This week your student will use two-way tables. Two-way tables are a way of comparing two variables. For example, this table shows the results of a study of the relation between meditation and state of mind of athletes before a track meet.
| meditated | did not meditate | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| calm | 45 | 8 | 53 |
| agitated | 23 | 21 | 44 |
| total | 68 | 29 | 97 |
23 of the people who meditated were agitated, while 21 of the people who did not meditate were agitated. Does this mean that meditation has no impact or even a slight negative association with mood? Probably not. When we look for associations between variables, it can be more informative to know the approximate percentages in each category, like this:
| meditated | did not meditate | |
|---|---|---|
| calm | 66% | 28% |
| agitated | 34% | 72% |
| total | 100% | 100% |
Of the people who meditated, about 66% were calm (\(45 \div 68 ≅ 0.66\)), and about 34% were agitated (\(23 \div 68 ≅ 0.34\)). When we compare that to the percentages for people who did not meditate, we can now see more easily that the group of people who meditated has a lower percentage of athletes who are agitated. The percentages in this table are called relative frequencies.
Here is a task to try with your student:
This table contains data about whether people in various age groups use their cell phone as their main alarm clock.
| use cell phone as alarm | do not use cell phone as alarm | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 to 29 years old | 47 | 16 | 63 |
| 30 to 49 years old | 66 | 21 | 87 |
| 50+ years old | 31 | 39 | 70 |
| total | 144 | 76 | 220 |
| use cell phone as alarm | do not use cell phone as alarm | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 to 29 years old | \(75\%\), since \(\frac{47}{63}≅0.75\) | 100% | |
| 30 to 49 years old | |||
| 50+ years old |
Solution:
| use cell phone as alarm | do not use cell phone as alarm | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 to 29 years old | \(75\%\), since \(\frac{47}{63}≅0.75\) | \(25\%\), since \(\frac{16}{63}≅0.25\) | 100% |
| 30 to 49 years old | \(76\%\), since \(\frac{66}{87}≅0.76\) | \(24\%\), since \(\frac{21}{87}≅0.24\) | 100% |
| 50+ years old | \(44\%\), since \(\frac{31}{70}≅0.44\) | \(56\%\), since \(\frac{39}{70}≅0.56\) | 100% |