Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
200 people were asked if they prefer dogs or cats and whether they live in a rural or urban setting.
The actual values collected from the survey are in the first table.
| urban | rural | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cat | 54 | 42 | 96 |
| dog | 80 | 24 | 104 |
| total | 134 | 66 | 200 |
The next table shows what percentage of the 200 total people are represented by each combination of categories. The segmented bar graph represents the same information graphically.
| urban | rural | |
|---|---|---|
| cat | 27% | 21% |
| dog | 40% | 12% |
The next table is a column relative frequency table and shows the percentage of people represented in each column that have a certain pet preference. The segmented bar graph represents the same information graphically.
| urban | rural | |
|---|---|---|
| cat | 40% | 64% |
| dog | 60% | 36% |
The last table is a row relative frequency table and shows the percentage of people represented in each row that live in a certain area. The segmented bar graph represents the same information graphically.
| urban | rural | |
|---|---|---|
| cat | 56% | 44% |
| dog | 77% | 23% |
Students may not understand the difference between what each relative frequency table represents. You can have a whole-class discussion about the presented data before students begin the task. You can also individually ask students questions concerning how the different representations relate to one another. For example: ”Which percentage in the relative frequency table corresponds to a specific portion of the bar graph?” Ensure students understand that each table uses a different total to get the percentages. Ask them, “Which tables are the questions referring to when it says, ‘Among the people surveyed’?”
The purpose of this discussion is to make sure students understand how to interpret information in a relative frequency table and to prime student thinking about associations between categorical variables.
After selecting a student to share a response, select another student to share which table or graph can be used to answer the question, then select a third student to explain the connection between the question and the table or graph.
Ask students:
In an experiment to test the effectiveness of vitamin C on the length of colds, two groups of people with colds are given a pill to take once a day. The pill for one of the groups contains 1,000 mg of vitamin C, while the other group takes a placebo pill. The researchers record the results in a table.
| group A | group B | |
|---|---|---|
| cold lasts less than a week | 16 | 27 |
| cold lasts a week or more | 17 | 53 |
First, the researchers want to know what percentage (to the nearest whole percent) of people are in each combination of categories. 14% of all the participants had a cold that lasted less than a week and were in group A. What percentage of all the participants had a cold that lasted less than a week and were in group B? Complete the rest of the relative frequency table with the corresponding percentages.
| group A | group B | |
|---|---|---|
| cold lasts less than a week | 14% | |
| cold lasts a week or more |
Next, the researchers notice that among participants who had colds that lasted less than a week, 37% were in group A. Among participants who had colds that lasted a week or more, what percentage were in group B? Complete the table with the corresponding percentages.
| group A | group B | |
|---|---|---|
| cold lasts less than a week | 37% | |
| cold lasts a week or more |
Finally, the researchers notice that among the participants in group A, 48% had colds that lasted less than one week. Among the participants in group B, how many had colds that lasted a week or more? Complete the table with the corresponding percentages.
| group A | group B | |
|---|---|---|
| cold lasts less than a week | 48% | |
| cold lasts a week or more |
When asked to complete the relative frequency table with percentages, students may struggle with using the correct totals. Bring to their attention the numbers used in the examples, and ask students where the denominators came from.
The goal of the discussion is to make sure students know how to create and interpret different two-way relative frequency tables from the same two-way frequency table. Ask the students identified as writing down the totals for the two-way table, “Why did you write down the totals for the two-way table?” (I wrote them down because I knew we would need them to calculate relative frequencies.) Talk about overall relative frequency, row relative frequency, and column relative frequency and the different interpretations of them.
“Why is it okay that the second column in the table for number 2 adds up to more than 100%?” (They are percentages of different wholes. It does not make sense to add them together.)
“How did you get the percentages for group B in the table for number 3?” (I divided the values for group B in the first table by 80, the total number in group B, then multiplied by 100.)
“What questions do the relative frequency tables help the researchers answer? Why are the tables powerful tools?” (They can help the researchers determine whether vitamin C has an effect on the length of a cold. The relative frequency tables are powerful because there are many more people in group B, so it is hard to compare the groups from the actual frequencies.)