Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Select work from students with different strategies, such as those described in the Activity Narrative, to share later.
If students are searching too far back, point students toward the proof in the Warm-up activity "Information Overload." The goal is for students to understand and adapt that proof to this situation, so help students find the proof relatively quickly so they can have time to engage in productive struggle as they try to understand and adapt it.
The goal of this discussion is to continue to emphasize that proofs using transformations are generalized statements that work for all triangles that match the given criteria, rather than just one specific drawing.
Select students whose triangles require translation and rotation but not reflection to share their drawings and the steps in their transformations. Record a proof that these triangles are congruent.
Then select a student whose triangles also require reflection. Display their drawings as well. Use Compare and Connect to help students compare, contrast, and connect the different representations. Here are some questions for discussion:
Conclude by adding a step to the recorded proof that begins, “If necessary, reflect the image of triangle . . . .” Encourage students to borrow language from the proof in the Warm-up.
Explain that we now have a general theorem that for any triangles in which it is known that two pairs of corresponding sides are congruent and the corresponding angles between them are congruent, they must be congruent. This means we don’t have to show the transformations anymore if we can just show that we’ve met the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem.
Point out the concluding statement. Add this to the display of sentence frames for proofs. This display should be posted in the classroom for the remaining lessons within this unit. You will add to the display throughout the unit. An example template is provided with the blackline master for this lesson.
Conclusion Statement:
Add the following theorem to the class reference chart, and ask students to add it to their reference charts:
Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem: In two triangles, if two pairs of congruent corresponding sides and the pair of corresponding angles between the sides are congruent, then the two triangles are congruent. (Theorem)
, and , so .
Display an isosceles triangle with base angles and , and other vertex .
Invite two students to act out this dialogue:
Kiran: I’m stumped on this proof.
Mai: What are you trying to prove?
Kiran: I’m trying to prove that in an isosceles triangle, the two base angles are congruent. So in this case, that angle is congruent to angle .
Mai: Let’s think of what geometry ideas we already know are true.
Kiran: We know if two pairs of corresponding sides and the corresponding angles between the sides are congruent, then the triangles must be congruent.
Mai: Yes, and we also know that we can use reflections, rotations, and translations to prove congruence and symmetry . . . . The isosceles triangle you’ve drawn makes me think of symmetry. If you draw a line down the middle of it, I wonder if that could help us prove that the angles are the same? [Mai draws the line of symmetry of the triangle and labels the intersection of and the line of symmetry .]
Kiran: Wait, when you draw the line, it breaks the triangle into two smaller triangles. I wonder if I could prove those triangles are congruent using Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence.
Mai: It’s an isosceles triangle, so we know that one pair of corresponding sides is congruent. [Mai marks the congruent sides.]
Kiran: And this segment in the middle here is part of both triangles, so it has to be the same length for both. Look. [Kiran draws the two halves of the isosceles triangle and marks the shared sides as congruent.]
Mai: So we have two pairs of corresponding sides that are congruent. How do we know the angles between them are congruent?
Kiran: I’m not sure. Maybe it has to do with how we drew that line of symmetry?
Tell students: Mathematicians call additional lines auxiliary lines, because auxiliary means “providing additional help or support.” Ask students what properties Mai might have used to draw the line of symmetry. (It’s perpendicular to the base. It bisects the base. It bisects angle .) If no student mentions it, draw their attention to the bisected angle. If students want to use a different property, invite them to attempt to write their own proof rather than fill in the blanks (there are several ways to get close to a proof but then get stuck since they have limited theorems available to prove something).
Mai and Kiran want to prove that in an isosceles triangle, the two base angles are congruent. Finish the proof that they started. Draw the auxiliary line, and define it so that you can use the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem to complete each statement in the proof.
Draw .
Segment is congruent to segment because of the definition of isosceles triangle.
Angle is congruent to angle because .
Segment is congruent to itself.
Therefore, triangle is congruent to triangle by the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem.
Therefore, .
The goal of this discussion is to have students explain why, in order to use the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence, it was helpful to define the auxiliary line as an angle bisector.
Add the following theorem to the class reference chart, and ask students to add it to their reference charts:
Isosceles Triangle Theorem: In an isosceles triangle, the base angles are congruent. (Theorem)
, so .