Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Andre remembers lots of ways to prove that triangles are congruent. He asks Clare, “Can we use Angle-Side-Angle to prove that triangles are similar?”
Clare: “Sure, but we don’t need the Side part because Angle-Angle is enough to prove that triangles are similar.”
Andre: “Hmm, what about Side-Angle-Side or Side-Side-Side? What if we don’t know 2 angles?”
Clare: “Oh! I don’t know. Let’s draw a picture and see if we can prove it.”
Andre: “Uh-oh. If ‘side’ means corresponding sides with the same length, then we’ll only get congruent triangles.”
Make sure that students are labeling only the information that they know in their diagram, so only a single pair of corresponding angles should be labeled as congruent.
The main idea to draw out of this activity is that knowing that the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem is true makes it much easier to prove the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Similarity Theorem.
Some students might use the dilation-first argument, and other students might define a specific sequence of rigid motions and a dilation, without mentioning the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem. Compare the two methods, and discuss how the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem gives us an opportunity to shorten our proof, by making use of a structure that has already been proven.
Prove that these 2 triangles must be similar.
Some students might use the dilation-first argument outlined in the student response, and other students might define a specific sequence of rigid motions and a dilation without mentioning the Side-Side-Side Triangle Similarity Theorem. This provides an opportunity to compare the two methods and to discuss how the Side-Side-Side Triangle Similarity Theorem gives an opportunity to shorten the proof by making use of structure.