The goal of this discussion is to come to a consensus on the summary of Priya’s proof. It’s OK to begin summarizing before every student has their own complete summary so long as all students have done some work to make sense of the proof. 

Invite students to share important ideas they noticed in the proof. 

• Priya used a rigid motion to line up congruent segments, just like the other proofs.
• She defined a perpendicular bisector and reflected over the perpendicular bisector to line up the third vertex, proving the triangles congruent.
• Each pair of corresponding congruent sides is used in the proof, and no angle measures are needed.

Point out that using perpendicular bisectors is a new reason why vertices have to coincide. Add this to the display of sentence frames for proofs. This display should be posted in the classroom for the remaining lessons within this unit. This is the final statement to add to the display. An example template is provided with the blackline master for this lesson.

Justifications:

•  is the perpendicular bisector of the segment connecting  and , as the perpendicular bisector is determined by two points that are both equidistant from the endpoints of a segment.

Add the following theorem to the class reference chart, and ask students to add it to their reference charts:

Side-Side-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem:
In two triangles, if all three pairs of corresponding sides are congruent, then the triangles must be congruent. (Theorem)

If students struggle longer than is productive, direct them to their reference charts. What do they know about parallelograms? (Opposite sides are congruent.)

Select partners who used the same approach and whose work is at similar levels of clarity to work together in groups of 4.

Instruct students to read the other group’s proof and decide if they agree with it, and if it could be improved to convince a skeptic. Invite each partnership to say one thing they noticed and liked about the proof, and one thing a skeptic might wonder about the proof.

If needed, brainstorm some things skeptics might be wondering about, such as:

• When you did that rotation, how did you know these points had to line up?
• How did you know those would be the same line?
• How did you know those lines could only intersect there?
• How did you know the Side-Side-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem would apply to these triangles? Did you list all three reasons?
• How did you know those sides were congruent?
• How does knowing the triangles are congruent help you prove the angles are congruent?
• Did you use any information that wasn’t given or that you didn’t have a reason for?
• Did what you proved match the problem?