Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Give students 2 minutes of quiet think time.
Optionally, instead of the abstract recipe description, you could bring in a clear glass, measuring implements, and the lemonade ingredients. Pour the ingredients in the glass and introduce the task that way.
A lemonade recipe calls for the juice of 5 lemons, 2 cups of water, and 2 tablespoons of honey.
Invent four new versions of this lemonade recipe:
This activity provides the first example of a relationship that is not proportional. The second question focuses students’ attention on the unit rates. If the relationship were proportional then regardless of the number of people in a vehicle, the cost per person would be the same. The question about the bus is to show students that they can’t just scale up from 10. Students who write an equation also see that it is not of the form . In a later lesson students will learn that only equations of this form represent proportional relationships.
Monitor for students who approached this problem using different representations.
Keep students in the same groups. Give students 5 minutes of quiet work time, followed by partner and whole-class discussion.
Entrance to a state park costs \$6 per vehicle, plus \$2 per person in the vehicle.
| number of people in vehicle | total entrance cost in dollars | 
|---|---|
| 2 | |
| 4 | |
| 10 | 
The goal of this discussion is to highlight how we know that the relationship is not proportional. Select students to explain why they think the relationship is or is not proportional. Some reasons they could give include:
Students who found an equation will also note that the equation is not of the same form as other equations, but they can’t use this as a criterion until the class has established that only equations of this form represent proportional relationships. (This part of the discussion should come at the end of the next lesson, after students have analyzed lots of different equations.)
Use Critique, Correct, Clarify to give students an opportunity to improve a sample written response to the last question by correcting errors, clarifying meaning, and adding details.
“Yes, the relationship is proportional. It says it costs $2 per person, so the constant of proportionality is 2.”
Ask, “What parts of this response are unclear, incorrect, or incomplete?” As students respond, annotate the display with 2–3 ideas to indicate the parts of the writing that could use improvement.
The purpose of this activity is to understand that discrete values in a table can be used to know for sure that a relationship is not proportional. However, they can’t be used to know for sure that a relationship definitely is proportional. There could be other values in the relationship, which are not shown on the table, that don’t fit the pattern.
This activity builds on previous ones involving constant speed but it analyzes pace (minutes per lap) rather than speed (laps per minute). Explaining why the information given in the table is enough to conclude that Han didn’t run at a constant pace but is not enough to know for sure whether Clare ran at a constant pace requires students to make a viable argument (MP3).
Math Community
Display the Math Community Chart for all to see. Give students a brief quiet think time to read the norms or invite a student to read them out loud. Tell them that during this activity they are going to choose a norm to focus on and practice. This norm should be one that they think will help themselves and their group during the activity. At the end of the activity, students can share what norm they chose and how the norm did or did not support their group.
Keep students in the same groups of 2. Introduce the context of running laps. Use Co-Craft Questions to orient students to the context and elicit possible mathematical questions.
Give 4–5 minutes of quiet work time, followed by partner and whole-class discussion.
Han and Clare were running laps around the track. The coach recorded their times at the end of laps 2, 4, 6, and 8.
Han's run:
| distance (laps) | time (minutes) | pace (minutes per lap) | 
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 8 | 23 | 
Clare's run:
| distance (laps) | time (minutes) | pace (minutes per lap) | 
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 8 | 20 | 
Invite students to explain why they think each person is or is not running at a constant pace. Point out to students that although the data points in the table for Clare are pairs in a proportional relationship, these four pairs of values do not guarantee that Clare ran at a constant pace. She might have, but it is unknown if she was running at a constant pace between the times that the coach recorded.
Ask the following questions:
Math Community
Invite 2–3 students to share the norm they chose and how it supported the work of the group or a realization they had about a norm that would have worked better in this situation. Provide these sentence frames to help students organize their thoughts in a clear, precise way:
Share with students, “Today we learned some ways to tell whether a table could represent a proportional relationship.”
To review how to determine whether a table represents a proportional relationship, consider asking students:
If desired, use this example to review these concepts:
| number of people | cost in dollars | dollars per person | 
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10 | 5 | 
| 3 | 15 | 5 | 
| 4 | 20 | 5 | 
| 5 | 20 | 4 | 
The table shows the cost to attend a choir concert. The first three rows have the same quotient, but the last row has a different quotient.
Here are the prices for some smoothies at two different smoothie shops:
Smoothie Shop A
| smoothie size (fl oz) | price ($) | dollars per ounce | 
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6 | 0.75 | 
| 12 | 9 | 0.75 | 
| 16 | 12 | 0.75 | 
| 0.75 | 
Smoothie Shop B
| smoothie size (fl oz) | price ($) | dollars per ounce | 
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6 | 0.75 | 
| 12 | 8 | 0.67 | 
| 16 | 10 | 0.625 | 
| ??? | ??? | 
For Smoothie Shop A, smoothies cost \$0.75 per ounce no matter which size we buy. There could be a proportional relationship between smoothie size and the price of the smoothie. An equation representing this relationship is where  represents size in ounces and  represents price in dollars. (The relationship could still not be proportional, if there were a different size on the menu that did not have the same price per ounce.)
For Smoothie Shop B, the cost per ounce is different for each size. Here the relationship between smoothie size and price is definitely not proportional.
In general, two quantities in a proportional relationship will always have the same quotient. When we see some values for two related quantities in a table and we get the same quotient when we divide them, that means they might be in a proportional relationship—but if we can't see all of the possible pairs, we can't be completely sure. However, if we know the relationship can be represented by an equation of the form , then we are sure it is proportional.
Some students may not account for the cost of the vehicle. They will get the following table with incorrect values and will need to be prompted to include the cost of the vehicle.
| number of people in vehicle | total entrance cost in dollars | 
|---|---|
| 2 | 10 | 
| 4 | 20 | 
| 10 | 50 | 
Teachers will want to circulate around the room keeping an eye out for this mistake and address it as soon as possible so that students spend most of their work time analyzing the nonproportional relationship. These diagrams may be helpful in illustrating to them that their resulting prices include more than one vehicle. This gives them an opportunity to make sense of problems and persevere in solving them (MP1).