Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Use these symbols to rank your choices for the field trip.
| option | vote |
|---|---|
| baseball game | |
| amusement park | |
| museum | |
| dance |
This activity presents another method for choosing among 3 or more choices when none wins a majority: instant runoff voting. In this voting system, voters again rank their choices. Each choice is given points, with 0 for the last choice, 1 for the next to last, and so on. The choice with the most total points wins, and no runoff elections are needed. Students use quantitative reasoning when analyzing the number of people satisfied by each voting method (MP2). They model with mathematics by comparing the voting methods and deciding what quantities are important (MP4).
Arrange students in groups of 2–4.
Tell students that we are now looking at another voting system: instant runoff. In this system, each voter ranks their choices and each rank is given a number of points: 0 for the last choice, 1 for the next to last, and so on. The choice with the most points wins, so only one round of voting is needed.
Display the table and ask students to raise their hand for each of their votes, using their choices from the previous activity. Each student should raise their hand 4 times total, once for each trip choice. Record the votes in a table like the one shown here:
| option | number of votes for top choice (star) |
number of votes for second choice (smiley) |
number of votes for third choice (square face) |
number of votes for last choice (X) |
total points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baseball game | |||||
| amusement park | |||||
| museum | |||||
| dance |
After the results are recorded for all to see and students understand the presented information, students work in groups and answer the questions in the Task Statement.
Your class just voted using the instant runoff system. Use the class data for the following questions.
In the runoff voting system, if there is not a winner from everyone’s first choices another vote is held and voters can change their choice because the least-voted option is eliminated. How does the instant runoff voting system also show voters’ other choices?
| what points did you give the winner? | number of people | % of people |
|---|---|---|
| top choice (3) | ||
| second choice (2) | ||
| third choice (1) | ||
| last choice (0) |
The purpose of this discussion is to compare instant runoff voting with plurality, runoff, and ranked voting. Here are some questions for discussion:
We have seen several methods for fairly deciding between more than two choices. There is no single fairest method. Different voting systems are used by different local, state, and federal governments as well as different countries.
In this activity, students make sense of how 5 friends voted on 3 choices of weekend activities. They also compare the results of some of the voting systems from the previous activities: plurality, runoff, and instant runoff. Students reason abstractly and quantitatively when calculating and interpreting the results of each voting method (MP2). They model with mathematics by evaluating the effectiveness of each voting method (MP4).
Arrange students in groups of 2–4.
Clare, Han, Mai, Tyler, and Noah are deciding what to do on the weekend. Their options are cooking, hiking, and bowling. Here are the points for their instant runoff vote. Each first choice gets 2 points, the second choice gets 1 point, and the last choice gets 0 points.
| cooking | hiking | bowling | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clare | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Han | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Mai | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Tyler | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Noah | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Which activity won using the instant runoff method? Show your calculations, and use expressions or equations.
Which activity would have won if there were just a vote for their top choice, with a majority or plurality winning?
Which activity would have won if there were a runoff election?
None