Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
The purpose of this Warm-up is for students to become familiar with a bar graph by noticing and wondering things about it. While reading a bar graph is a review of a previous grade's work, it is an important for students to look for patterns of association in categorical data.
When students articulate what they notice and wonder, they have an opportunity to attend to precision in the language they use to describe what they see (MP6). They might first propose less formal or imprecise language, and then restate their observation with more precise language in order to communicate more clearly.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Display the table and images for all to see. Ask students to think of at least 1 thing they notice and at least 1 thing they wonder. Give students 1 minute of quiet think time, and then 1 minute to discuss the things they notice and wonder with their partner.
What do you notice? What do you wonder?
Two-way table
| has cell phone |
does not have cell phone |
total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 to 12 years old | 25 | 35 | 60 |
| 13 to 15 years old | 40 | 10 | 50 |
| 16 to 18 years old | 50 | 10 | 60 |
| total | 115 | 55 | 170 |
Bar graph
Segmented bar graph
Ask students to share the things they noticed and wondered. Record and display their responses without editing or commentary for all to see. If possible, record the relevant reasoning on or near the table and images. Next, ask students, “Is there anything on this list that you are wondering about now?” Encourage students to observe what is on display and respectfully ask for clarification, point out contradicting information, or voice any disagreement.
If a relationship between the 2 variables does not come up during the conversation, ask students to discuss this idea.
Tell students that, in this course, bar graphs are assumed to have a vertical axis representing the frequency of the categories and segmented bar graphs have a vertical axis representing percentage of the category.
Matching Representations Cards
In this activity students become familiar with two-way tables, clustered bar graphs, and segmented bar graphs by matching different situations.
Students sort different representations of data during this activity. A sorting task gives students opportunities to analyze representations, statements, and structures closely and make connections (MP2, MP7).
Monitor for different ways groups choose to categorize the representations, but especially for categories that distinguish between two-way tables, bar graphs, and segmented bar graphs.
As students work, encourage them to refine their descriptions of each kind of representation using more precise language and mathematical terms (MP6).
Use Collect and Display to create a shared reference that captures students’ developing mathematical language. Collect the language students use to describe two-way tables, bar graphs, and segmented bar graphs. Display words and phrases such as “total,” “stacked,” “legend” or “key,” “percentage,” and “categories.”
Arrange students in groups of 2 and distribute pre-cut cards. Tell them that in this activity, they will sort some cards into categories of their choosing. When they sort the representations, they should work with their partner to come up with categories.
Distribute 1 set of the pre-cut cards from the blackline master to each group.
Your teacher will give you a set of cards. Each card contains a representation of some data.
Sort the systems into groups that represent the same situation. Be prepared to explain how you know where each representation belongs.
Label the bar graphs and segmented bar graphs so that the categories represented by each bar are indicated.
The purpose of this activity is to help students understand the connections among the 3 representations of data. It also helps students see the importance of labeled visual representations.
Direct students’ attention to the reference created using Collect and Display. Ask students to share their matches from the Card Sort. Invite students to borrow language from the display as needed and update the reference to include additional phrases as they respond. Keep the display for the next activity.
In this activity, students create two-way tables displaying relative frequency. The relative frequency table converts the actual frequency data to percentages which can be useful when comparing groups that include different totals. Finally, students use the relative frequencies to look for a pattern in the data. In the following lesson, students will work with associations in categorical data more explicitly. In this activity, students should use an informal understanding of association to think about whether one is present in the data based on the relative frequency table.
Keep students in groups of 2–3. After an introduction to relative frequency tables, allow students 3 minutes quiet work time followed by partner discussion and whole-class discussion.
Display the table for all to see.
| watch the news daily | does not watch the news daily | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| younger than 18 | 30 | 80 | 110 |
| 18 or older | 10 | 5 | 15 |
| total | 40 | 85 | 125 |
Ask students, "Based on this data, who is more likely to watch the news daily: someone who is younger than 18 or someone who is 18 or older?"
Tell students that, based on the numbers in the table, there are more younger people who watch the news (30) than older (10). On the other hand, the survey reached out to 110 young people and only 15 older people. Without looking at the whole table, that information may have been missed.
In cases like this, finding a relative frequency including percentages can be more helpful than looking at the actual frequency, which is what they are going to do now.
Display the relative frequency table:
| watch the news daily | does not watch the news daily | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| younger than 18 | 27%, because | 73% | 100% |
| 18 or older | 67% | 33% | 100% |
Tell students that we would say there is an association between these variables because the relative frequencies of the columns are very different. This means that knowing information about one of the variables, like the age range, would be helpful in making a prediction about the other variable, like whether that person watches the news. If the relative frequencies had been close, then knowing information about one of the variables would not be helpful in making a prediction about the other variable and there would not be an association between the variables.
Use Collect and Display to direct attention to words collected and displayed from an earlier activity. Ask students to suggest ways to update the display: “Are there any new words or phrases that you would like to add?” “Is there any language you would like to revise or remove?” Display additional words or phrases such as “actual frequency” or “relative frequency.” Encourage students to use the display as a reference.
Here is a two-way table that shows data about cell phone usage among children aged 10 to 18.
| has cell phone | does not have cell phone | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 to 12 years old | 25 | 35 | 60 |
| 13 to 15 years old | 40 | 10 | 50 |
| 16 to 18 years old | 50 | 10 | 60 |
| total | 115 | 55 | 170 |
Complete the table. In each row, the entries for “has cell phone” and “does not have cell phone” should have the total 100%. Round entries to the nearest percentage point.
| has cell phone | does not have cell phone | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 to 12 years old | 42% | ||
| 13 to 15 years old | 100% | ||
| 16 to 18 years old | 17% |
This is still a two-way table. Instead of showing frequency, this table shows relative frequency.
Students may not calculate relative frequencies correctly. Look to see if they are dividing into the total for each row, instead of some other number in the row, or the total for the entire table.
Students may struggle to decide if there is an association or not. Tell students that an association means that knowing information about one variable makes it easier to predict the other variable. For example, if they wanted to predict whether a person has a cell phone, would their prediction change if they knew which age category the person fit into?
The purpose of this discussion is to help students see the usefulness of two-way tables that display relative frequency.
Direct students’ attention to the reference created using Collect and Display. Ask students to share their solutions to the questions. Invite students to borrow language from the display as needed and update the reference to include additional phrases as they respond.
Some questions for discussion:
Display the graphs and tell students to refer to the data from the tables in the "Building Another Type of Two-Way Table" activity.
Consider asking these discussion questions to emphasize the main ideas from the lesson:
Survey students about whether they play a musical instrument or not and whether they play a sport or not. These data will be needed for the next lesson.
When we collect data by counting things in various categories, like red, blue, or yellow, we call the data “categorical data,” and we say that color is a “categorical variable.”
We can use two-way tables to investigate possible connections between two categorical variables.
For example, this two-way table of frequencies shows the results of a study of meditation and state of mind of athletes before a track meet.
| meditated | did not meditate | total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| calm | 45 | 8 | 53 |
| agitated | 23 | 21 | 44 |
| total | 68 | 29 | 97 |
If we are interested in the question of whether there is an association between meditating and being calm, we might present the frequencies in a bar graph, grouping data about those who meditated and those who did not meditate, so we can compare the numbers of calm and agitated athletes in each group.
Notice that the number of athletes who did not meditate is small compared to the number who meditated (29 as compared to 68, as shown in the table).
If we want to know the proportions of calm meditators and calm non-meditators, we can make a two-way table of relative frequencies and present the relative frequencies in a segmented bar graph.
| meditated | did not meditate | |
|---|---|---|
| calm | 66% | 28% |
| agitated | 34% | 72% |
| total | 100% | 100% |