Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Arrange students in groups of 3 or 4. Display the populations of the three cities from the Warm-up.
| City | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris | 6,300,000 | 7,400,000 | 8,200,000 | 8,700,000 | 9,300,000 | 9,700,000 |
| Austin | 132,000 | 187,000 | 254,000 | 346,000 | 466,000 | 657,000 |
| Chicago | 3,600,000 | 3,550,000 | 3,400,000 | 3,000,000 | 2,800,000 | 2,900,000 |
Ask students: "Can this information be used to predict today's population in the three cities? How? What about the population in 2050?" Give students a minute of quiet think time and then time to share their thoughts with their group. Invite groups to share their responses. Highlight responses that suggest that we observe whether they grow linearly or exponentially (either by calculation or by graphing) and then create mathematical models accordingly.
Provide access to graphing technology. It is ideal if each student has their own device. If students are to present their models on visual displays, provide access to tools for creating visual displays.
Select students with different strategies, such as those described in the Activity Narrative, and ask them to share later.
Here are population data for three cities at different times between 1950 and 2000. What does the data tell us, if anything, about the current population in the cities or what the population will be in 2050?
| City | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris | 6,300,000 | 7,400,000 | 8,200,000 | 8,700,000 | 9,300,000 | 9,700,000 |
| Austin | 132,000 | 187,000 | 254,000 | 346,000 | 466,000 | 657,000 |
| Chicago | 3,600,000 | 3,550,000 | 3,400,000 | 3,000,000 | 2,800,000 | 2,900,000 |
Students may continue to find modeling tasks uncomfortable and challenging. Remind students that real-world data is often very "messy" and we should use the tools we have to approximate and estimate values as best as we can, but it will probably not line up exactly.
Focus the discussion on how students decided on the model to use for Paris and Chicago, and the specific models (the equations) they chose. Either linear or exponential can be justified, though students can also argue that neither of these models is appropriate because neither the successive differences (linear) nor the successive quotients (exponential) are close to being constant.
Invite previously selected groups to share how they decided what models to use, including the values they selected in their models. Sequence the discussion of the strategies by the order listed in the Activity Narrative. If possible, record and display their work for all to see.
Connect the different responses to the learning goals by asking questions such as:
Display the table from the task statement for all to see. Invite students to observe the table and share what they notice and what they wonder.
After students have worked on the first two problems, consider pausing for a discussion. Consider searching the internet for a short video about the growth of world population using “human population growth” in a search engine. Students should be invited to consider how human population growth and resource use can impact the planet in the future.
| year | 1804 | 1927 | 1960 | 1974 | 1987 | 1999 | 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| world population in billions | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Students may not notice that the years in the table are not consecutive. Help point out that the table shows only the years at which the next billion-person milestone was reached.
The way the data is presented shows that the world population is not growing linearly. If it were, then it would consistently take about the same number of years to grow by 1 billion. To bring this point home, ask questions such as:
To test whether or not the data might be exponential is more subtle. One good strategy is to check some doubling times. It took:
Based on this information, an exponential model for the entire period of time is probably not the best (the growth rate was faster in the 20th century than in the 19th), but a couple of different exponential models might work well (one for each century). If students dig deeper into the data, they will find that a linear model is remarkably good for the past few decades. If the videos suggested in the Launch were not shown earlier (after the first two problems), consider showing them here.