Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
The purpose of this activity is to see a method of developing an equation to model a set of data.
This activity uses the Worked Example routine. In this routine, students analyze steps used to solve a problem and discuss specific steps with a partner and the whole class. During the discussions, students construct viable arguments to justify the steps taken by the problem solver (MP3). Later, students can apply these strategies to solve similar problems.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Tell them to close their books or devices (or to keep them closed). Reveal the prompt and the first step. Give students a brief quiet think time, and ask them to give a signal when they have read the step and are ready to see the next. Once most students have given the signal, reveal the next step. Repeat until all steps have been revealed.
If previous work indicates that most students will struggle to make sense of a step, pause and give students 1 minute to discuss with their partner and formulate a question about the step. Ask 1–3 groups to share their questions, inviting other groups to answer while recording responses next to the step for all to see. Once questions have been answered, continue to the next reveal.
What is an equation that would be a reasonable model for this data?
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
The purpose of this discussion is to explore a method of creating an equation to model a set of data.
Tell students to open their books or devices. Display the following questions, and give students 1–2 minutes of quiet think time to consider their responses.
Ask partners to compare their responses to each question and decide if either or both answers are correct. During this partner discussion, monitor to select groups who reason about the questions in different ways. Follow with a whole-class discussion, inviting 1–2 selected groups to share their answers for each question.
If time allows, consider displaying a second worked example next to the first that either:
The purpose of this activity is to review how to create a scatter plot using technology and come up with a function to model the data. This work is similar to the work in the associated Algebra 1 lesson but includes more explicit instructions and steps toward analyzing data and choosing an appropriate model (MP4).
Graphing technology is needed for every student. Display the table of data for all to see, and ask students whether they think a linear or exponential model would be a better fit for this data. After a minute of quiet think time, ask a few students to share their reasoning.
If needed, demonstrate using graphing technology to input the given data and create a scatter plot.
If the graphing technology platform allows it, consider showing students how to create sliders. In Desmos, simply type in the expressions list, and then click “all” to add sliders for both and . You may need to adjust the maximum value of one or both sliders to be able to use them to create a good model for this data.
In the spring, an agave plant sends up a flower spike. Here are some data collected from an agave plant in a garden in Tucson, AZ, starting on April 2:
| day | height in inches |
|---|---|
| 0 | 17 |
| 1 | 23 |
| 2 | 29 |
| 3 | 37 |
| 4 | 45 |
| 5 | 52 |
| 6 | 62 |
| 7 | 70 |
| 8 | 80 |
The purpose of this discussion is to compare the equation models students created. Display the scatter plot using technology. Graph some of the different equations students used as models. Here are some questions for discussion:
Invite students to share their responses to the last three questions.
This activity is an opportunity to practice some of the discrete skills used in modeling data in two variables with a function. Students decide between different possible models for different sets of data, which is a part of modeling with mathematics (MP4). The first two data sets are more scaffolded because they ask students questions about the type of function that would fit best and the meaning of the numbers in the equation. The other data sets are less scaffolded because they ask students only to develop an equation to model the data directly.
Monitor for students who use these different strategies:
Data Set A shows the height in feet of some buildings and the number of floors in each building. Would a linear or exponential model be a better fit?
Data Set B shows the results of using the “enlarge by 25%” feature on a copy machine several times on a photo. The width in centimeters of the photo is measured after each copy is made. Would a linear or exponential model be a better fit?
| day | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| height in inches | 34 | 44 | 52 | 61 | 68 | 74 | 83 | 91 | 97 |
| number of cubes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number of rolls | 5 | 29 | 140 | 794 | 3,861 |
The goal of this discussion is to compare methods of creating models based on data sets.
Display 2–3 approaches from previously selected students for all to see. Use Compare and Connect to help students compare, contrast, and connect the different approaches. Here are some questions for discussion:
Continue the discussion, focusing on how students decided on the model to use for Data Sets C and D.
Ask students what features they would expect in a good linear or exponential model. Important responses include: