Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Display for all to see the graphic that illustrates a framework for the Information Gap routine.
Explain that in an Information Gap routine students work with a partner. One partner gets a problem card with a question that doesn’t have enough given information, and the other partner gets a data card with information relevant to the problem card.
The person with the problem card asks questions like “Can you tell me _____?” and is expected to explain what they will do with the information. If that person asks for information that is not on the data card (including the answer) and gives their reason, then the person with the data card must respond with, “I don’t have that information.” The person with the data card should just be providing information, not making assumptions. Note that it is okay to help a stuck partner by saying something like “I don't have the line of reflection. I only have information about the images of points.”
Once the partner with the problem card has enough information, both partners look at the problem card and solve the problem independently.
Arrange students in groups of 2 or 4. If students are new to the Information Gap routine, allowing them to work in groups of 2 for each role supports communication and understanding. In each group, distribute a problem card to one student (or group) and a data card to the other student (or group). After reviewing their work on the first problem, give them the cards for a second problem, and instruct them to switch roles.
Encourage students to annotate their diagram.
Your teacher will give you either a problem card or a data card. Do not show or read your card to your partner.
If your teacher gives you the problem card:
If your teacher gives you the data card:
The purpose of discussion is to emphasize that the line of reflection is the perpendicular bisector of segments that connect points on the original figure to points on the image.
Display the conjecture that the set of points that are the same distance from two given points is the perpendicular bisector of the segment connecting those two points. Ask, “What should we expect to see if we made segments connecting points to their images?” (We should expect to see that the line of reflection is the perpendicular bisector of all segments that connect points to images.) Ask students to verify this experimentally by drawing segments that connect points to images from their data card and the line of reflection.
Here are some additional questions for discussion to choose based on time and students’ understanding from the previous lesson:
Arrange students in groups of 2. Remind students that if there is a sequence of rigid transformations that takes one figure onto another, the figures are called "congruent." Tell students there are many possible answers for the questions. After quiet work time, ask students to compare their responses to their partner’s and decide if they are both correct, even if they are different. Follow with a whole-class discussion.
If students are struggling after several minutes, invite students to share what rigid motions they will need. (They will need reflection because Figure B is an L shape and Figure C can be rotated to look like an L, but Figure A cannot be.) Suggest that they start each sequence with a reflection, then use a translation.
Here are three congruent L shapes on a grid.
Reversing the order of a sequence means using the same steps, but step 2 becomes step 1. For example, 1) reflect across line , then 2) translate left 2 units would become 1) translate left 2 units, then 2) reflect across line .
Select previously identified students to share their responses.
Highlight that reversing the steps in a sequence of transformations sometimes results in the same transformation, and sometimes it results in a different transformation.