Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Tell students that they will practice explaining to a partner why certain moves are valid ways to write equivalent equations. Demonstrate what it means to explain or defend the steps rather than simply describing them, as shown in the Activity Narrative.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Ask the partners in each group to choose different equations from each column. Give students a few minutes of quiet time to think about and write explanations about the equations in column A. Then, give students time to take turns sharing their explanations with their partner before moving on to column B.
Tell students that when one student explains, the partner’s job is to listen and make sure that they agree and that the explanation makes sense. If they don't agree, the partners discuss until they come to an agreement.
Repeat the process with the equations in column B.
Here are some pairs of equations. While one partner listens, the other partner should:
Then switch roles until you run out of time or you run out of pairs of equations.
| A | B | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
Students may have trouble seeing why some equations in column B are not equivalent (particularly the second item, which contains a common error). Encourage these students to choose one pair of equations, solve one equation, and then substitute the solution into the other equation to see what goes wrong.
Invite previously identified students to share their explanations on at least a couple of pairs of equations from each column. If not already clear from students' explanations, emphasize that:
Explain to students that next they will look at some examples where the moves made to write equivalent equations appear to be acceptable but the resulting equations turn out to be false statements.
Noah is having trouble solving two equations. In each case, he takes steps that he thinks are acceptable but ends up with statements that are clearly not true.
Analyze Noah’s work on each equation and the moves he made. Are they acceptable moves? Why do you think he ends up with a false equation?
Discuss your observations with your group and be prepared to share your conclusions. If you get stuck, consider solving each equation.
Some students may point to a step that is valid and mistakenly identify it as an error. For instance, in the first set of steps, they may object to replacing with , thinking that it should be rearranged to . Push their reasoning with a simpler example. Ask, for instance, if is equivalent to . Remind students that we can think of as and then apply the commutative property of addition to get .
If students hypothesize about two equations being equivalent but are not sure how to check if it's actually the case, suggest that a good way to check is by finding the solution to one equation, then checking whether that value is also a solution to the second equation.
Invite students to share what they thought was the problem with Noah’s work. They are likely to say that Noah seems to have performed allowable moves and did them correctly. Then draw students' attention to the second-to-last step: . Ask students:
Explain that dividing by the variable in the equation is not done because if the solution happens to be 0, it could lead us to thinking that there is no solution while in fact there is (the solution is the number 0).
Revisit the lists of acceptable and unacceptable moves compiled in earlier activities. Add ”dividing by the variable” and ”dividing by 0” to the list of unacceptable moves.