Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Here are 2 lines and that are not parallel and have been cut by a transversal.
Tyler thinks angle is congruent to angle because they are corresponding angles and a translation along the directed line segment from to would take one angle onto the other. Here are his reasons.
Here is triangle with angle measures , , and . Each side has been extended to a line.
Using rotations and parallel lines, we can understand why the angles in a triangle always add to 180 degrees. Here is triangle .
Rotate triangle 180 degrees around the midpoint of segment , and label the image of as . Then rotate triangle 180 degrees around the midpoint of segment , and label the image of as .
Note that each 180-degree rotation takes line to a parallel line. So line is parallel to , and line is also parallel to . There is only one line parallel to that goes through point , so lines and are the same line. Since line is parallel to line , we know that alternate interior angles are congruent. That means that angle also measures , and angle also measures .
Since is a line, the 3 angle measures at point must sum to 180 degrees. So . This argument does not depend on the triangle we started with, so that proves the sum of the 3 angle measures of any triangle is always 180 degrees.