Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
This Warm-up prompts students to compare four geometric patterns. It gives students a reason to use language precisely (MP6). It gives the teacher an opportunity to hear how students use terminology and talk about characteristics of the items in comparison to one another.
Arrange students in groups of 2–4. Display the images for all to see. Give students 1 minute of quiet think time and ask them to indicate when they have noticed three images that go together and can explain why. Next, tell students to share their response with their group, and then together find as many sets of three as they can.
Which three go together? Why do they go together?
Invite each group to share one reason why a particular set of three go together. Record and display the responses for all to see. After each response, ask the class if they agree or disagree. Since there is no single correct answer to the question of which three go together, attend to students’ explanations and ensure the reasons given are correct.
During the discussion, prompt students to explain the meaning of any terminology they use, such as “row,” “group,” “partition,” “even,” “odd,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “ratio,” or “area,” and to clarify their reasoning as needed. Consider asking:
If time allows, invite 2–3 students to briefly share what they notice all of the figures have in common. For example:
The purpose of this concluding share out is to reinforce the importance of using precise terminology. For example, saying “the ratio of blue to yellow” is not specific enough. The ratio of blue area to yellow area is for all of the figures, while the ratio of blue pieces to yellow pieces is either or .
In this activity, students practice writing an equation to represent a proportional relationship given in a table. This activity revisits the idea that there are two reciprocal constants of proportionality between two related quantities. Students use repeated reasoning (MP8) to arrive at the equations and to identify the constants of proportionality as reciprocals.
We return to the context of measurement conversion, again examining the same distances measured in two different units. Previously students compared centimeters with millimeters and saw that the constants of proportionality were 10 and . Here, students compare meters with centimeters and see that the constants of proportionality are 100 and . The similarities between this activity and the earlier one may cause this activity to go very quickly.
Remind students that in an earlier lesson, they examined the relationship between millimeters and centimeters. Tell them that today, they will examine the relationship between centimeters and meters.
There are 100 centimeters (cm) in every meter (m).
| length (m) | length (cm) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 100 |
| 0.94 | |
| 1.67 | |
| 57.24 | |
| length (cm) | length (m) |
|---|---|
| 100 | 1 |
| 250 | |
| 78.2 | |
| 123.9 | |
The purpose of this discussion is to highlight how the two equations illustrate the reciprocal relationship. Invite students to share how they found the equation for each table. Consider asking:
Display and discuss this sequence of equivalent equations to help students see why the constants of proportionality are reciprocals:
This line of reasoning should be accessible to students, because it builds on grade 6 work with expressions and equations.
Ask students to interpret the meaning of the equations in the context: “What do the equations tell us about the conversion from meters to centimeters and back?”
In this activity, students make sense of the two rates associated with a given proportional relationship (MP2). Students are asked to identify the two equations that represent a situation, working with both the number of gallons per minute and the number of minutes per gallon. This activity is the first time that no table is given to help students make sense of the proportional relationship, though students may find it helpful to create a table.
Monitor for students who use different ways to decide if the cooler was filling faster before or after the flow rate was changed.
Give students 4–5 minutes quiet work time followed by partner and a whole-class discussion.
It took Priya 5 minutes to fill a cooler with 8 gallons of water from a faucet that was flowing at a steady rate. Let be the number of gallons of water in the cooler after minutes.
Which of the following equations represent the relationship between and ? Select all that apply.
What does 1.6 tell you about the situation?
What does 0.625 tell you about the situation?
Priya changed the rate at which water flowed through the faucet. Write an equation that represents the relationship of and when it takes 3 minutes to fill the cooler with 1 gallon of water.
For the first question, if students struggle to identify the correct equations, encourage them to create two tables of values for the situation. Encourage them to create rows for both unit rates, in order to foster connections to prior learning.
The goal of this discussion is to connect the meaning of each constant of proportionality with the structure of each equation that represents the relationship. Invite students to share how they decided which equations represent the situation. Ask students to interpret what the equations tell us about the situation.
If not mentioned by students, highlight the fact that 1.6 and 0.625 are reciprocals. Since these constants of proportionality are given as decimals in the equations, it may be harder for students to recognize this relationship. Consider asking half the class to calculate while the other half calculates .
Next, invite students to share their responses to the last two questions about Priya changing the rate of water flow. Two possible approaches for the last question are:
It is not necessary to demonstrate every possible approach. The goal is for students to see how keeping in mind the meaning of the numbers and variables is helpful for making sense of the situation.
Optional
This activity provides an additional opportunity for students to represent a proportional relationship with two related equations in a new context. This situation builds on the earlier work students did with feeding a crowd, but includes more complicated calculations. Students interpret the meaning of the constants of proportionality in the context of the situation and use the equations to answer questions.
Arrange students in groups of 2. Introduce the context of feeding animals in an aquarium. Give students 6 minutes of partner work time followed by whole-class discussion.
At an aquarium, a shrimp is fed gram of food each feeding and is fed 3 times each day.
How much food does a shrimp get fed in 1 day?
Complete the table to show how many grams of food the shrimp is fed over different numbers of days.
| number of days | grams of food |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| 7 | |
| 30 |
The goal of this discussion is to highlight the structure of the two equations that represent the proportional relationship, including the meaning of the two constants of proportionality. Invite students to share their answers. Ask students which equation was most useful to answer each of the last two questions and to explain their reasoning.
Share with students, “Today we saw how to write two different equations for the same proportional relationship.”
To review the reciprocal relationship between these equations, consider asking students:
If desired, use this example to review these concepts:
If Kiran rode his bike at a constant 10 miles per hour, his distance in miles, , is proportional to the number of hours, , that he rode. We can write the equation to represent the proportional relationship. With this equation, it is easy to find the distance Kiran rode when we know how long it took, because we can just multiply the time by 10.
We can rewrite the equation:
This version of the equation tells us that the amount of time Kiran rode is proportional to the distance he traveled, and the constant of proportionality is . That form of the equation is easier to use when we know his distance and want to find how long it took, because we can just multiply the distance by .
When two quantities and are in a proportional relationship, we can write the equation and say, “ is proportional to .” In this case, the number is the corresponding constant of proportionality. We can also write the equation and say, “ is proportional to .” In this case, the number is the corresponding constant of proportionality. Each equation can be useful, depending on the information we have and the quantity we are trying to figure out.