Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Help us improve by sharing suggestions or reporting issues.
None
The goal of this activity is for students to explore how multiplying the output of a function by a scale factor affects the shape of its graph. Students are also building skills that will help them in mathematical modeling (MP4). While they don’t decide which model to use, students do have an opportunity to transform a function to better fit a given shape.
Monitor for students who identify the scale factor in different ways, such as guess and check or identifying what to multiply the vertex of the parabola by to change from 676 to 25, to share during the whole-class discussion.
Display the graph with the overlaid axes and grid for all to see throughout the activity. After 5 minutes of work time, pause the class and invite students to share how they labeled the three marked coordinates and what the corresponding points are on the graph of
Select students with different strategies, such as those described in the Activity Narrative, to share later.
The Hulme Arch Bridge in Manchester, England is shaped like a parabola. The ends of the arch are 52 meters apart, and it is 25 meters high.
The purpose of this discussion is for students to describe how they can adjust a parabolic function in order to model a situation. Ask 2–3 students to share what aspects of the shape they think Han’s function does and does not model well, recording responses for all to see next to the displayed graph. Invite previously selected students to share their responses comparing the height of Han’s graph and the height of the bridge, starting with students who used a guess and check method and ending with students who calculated a scale factor of
Conclude the discussion by telling students that the value 0.037 is often called a scale factor. In this instance, the scale factor compressed the graph vertically by a factor of 0.037 toward the
MLR5: Co-Craft Questions
To Gather
Graphing technology
This activity builds on the work done in a previous activity. Students now consider two possible function types for modeling a given data set. They begin by creating a line of best fit for the data and identifying what the linear function does and does not model well. Since the shape of the data shows a downward trend, students then consider a radical function to model the data and use graphing technology to identify an appropriate scale factor to use with a given expression. In this activity, students are building skills that will help them in mathematical modeling (MP4). They don’t decide which model to use, but students have an opportunity to consider two different functions as models and to revise a function to fit a given data set.
Graphing technology is needed for every student.
A certain brand of dog food gives the minimum daily amount of food a dog needs depending on its weight. We want to model the relationship between the amount of food and the dog’s weight with a function
| dog weight (pounds) | food amount (grams) |
|---|---|
| 5 | 50 |
| 10 | 75 |
| 20 | 130 |
| 40 | 230 |
| 60 | 305 |
| 80 | 375 |
| 100 | 435 |
If students are unsure how to start identifying an appropriate value for
“Tell me more about how a scale factor
“How could graphing different values of
The goal of this discussion is for students to understand that if we can recognize the general shape of data (or of an image, as in the previous activity), we can then identify a function type to model the data. Once the function type is known, we can use what we know about graphical transformations to fit a function to the data.
Here are some questions for discussion:
Building Toward