During this unit, students will engage in each phase of the proof-writing cycle as they study and review properties of triangles and quadrilaterals. Writing proofs doesn’t mean only providing the reasons for someone else’s claim. Constructing a viable argument includes generating conjectures, detailing specific statements to be proved, writing a proof, and critiquing a proof. Students write proofs, starting with informal justifications and ending with formal proofs using definitions, assertions, and theorems developed in Math 1.
This unit begins by asking students to make observations about triangles. Students use experimental information to develop conjectures about triangles and justify those conjectures informally, preparing students for proof writing.
In the next section, students write rigorous proofs. Students use many of the properties of angles and triangles reviewed in the first section and the rigid transformations reviewed in this section. Though students may use imprecise language to convey their ideas at first, throughout the unit they will read examples, practice explaining ideas to a partner, and build a reference of precise statements to use in formal proofs.
In a previous course, students used transformations to prove the triangle congruence theorems, which are reviewed in this section. Building on their work with triangles, students learn and prove properties of quadrilaterals.
Note on materials: For many activities in this unit, students have access to a geometry toolkit that includes many tools that students can choose from strategically: compass and straightedge, tracing paper, colored pencils, and scissors. In some lessons, students will also need access to a ruler and protractor. When students work with quadrilaterals, instructions for making 1-inch strips cut from cardstock with evenly spaced holes are included. These strips allow students to explore dynamic relationships among sides and diagonals of quadrilaterals. Finally, there are some activities that are best done using dynamic geometry software, and these lessons indicate that digital materials are preferred. Students have the opportunity to choose appropriate tools (MP5) in nearly every lesson as they select among these options. For this reason, this math practice is highlighted only in lessons where it’s particularly noteworthy.
Starting in the first section, a blank reference chart and reference material from a previous course are provided for students, and a completed reference chart is provided for teachers. The reference chart is a resource for students to refer to as they make formal arguments. To model clear communication with mathematical language, point students toward particular entries by describing their content instead of by number. For example, say “definition of ‘congruent’” instead of “definition 2.” Students will continue adding to the reference chart throughout the course. Refer to the Course Guide for more information.
These materials use words rather than symbolic notation to allow students to focus on the content. By using words, students do not need to translate the meaning of a symbol while reading. To increase exposure to different notations, images with given information marked using ticks, right angle marks, or arrows also have a caption with the symbolic notation. Feel free to use the symbolic notation when recording student responses, as that is an appropriate use of shorthand.
This unit intentionally allows extra time for students to learn new routines and establish norms for the year.
Label diagrams in order to write precise conjectures.
Prove theorems about lines and angles.
Section Narrative
In this section students create conjectures about angle relationships and prove them using what they know about rigid transformations. Students review rigid transformations to support this skill.
The primary work is on proof-writing skills. In order to focus on justification, many proofs are for ideas students were first introduced to in previous grades, such as supplementary, complementary, vertical, and adjacent angles. Students also prove the Triangle Angle Sum Theorem using the rigorous definitions reviewed and developed throughout this section.
Students are learning ways to express their reasoning more formally. Expect students to put together explanations with various levels of formality. Mastery of proof writing is not expected by the end of this section. A more reasonable goal is for students to consistently label and mark figures to indicate congruence which helps them communicate more precisely.
The proofs in these materials are all written in narrative form. The narrative format matches the discussion students might have to use to convince their partner, and it also matches the way mathematicians write proofs. While students may use other formats to support their organization, it is important that students can see the flow of reasoning that exists in a well-written proof. A two-column proof can be thought of like an outline for an essay. Outlines help organize thoughts, but an outline is less persuasive than a well-written essay. Students should learn to write a well-written justification in the form of a narrative proof.
This section intentionally allows extra time for students to learn new routines and establish norms for the year.
Determine what information is known and what information is needed to solve a problem involving triangles.
Justify informally and use the Triangle Inequality Theorem.
Section Narrative
In this section, students explore properties of triangles. The first three lessons of this section are purposefully paced to allow class time to learn routines and build math community.
First, students make observations about possible side lengths of a triangle and practice communicating their ideas. Next, students write the Triangle Inequality Theorem as a conjecture, an initial step to the proof writing students will do in this unit. In the following lesson, students write the Triangle Inequality Theorem as an explicit mathematical statement, informally justify their ideas, and practice using the theorem in a problem in which they engage with aspects of mathematical modeling.
In the next three lessons, students explore what happens to sides in a triangle as the angle opposite that side changes. This leads to an understanding that longer sides are across from larger angles and vice versa. Students review angle pairs and triangle properties to solve for unknown angles in figures made up of several triangles and use those angles to make conclusions about the sides of the triangles. Students end the section with an Information Gap designed to solidify their understanding of triangle properties and to build their communication skills.
In this final section, students have the opportunity to apply their thinking from throughout the unit. As this is a short section followed by an End-of-Unit Assessment, there are no section goals or checkpoint questions.
Critique others’ justifications about quadrilaterals.
Use previously proven theorems to write new proofs about quadrilaterals.
Section Narrative
In this section students apply the triangle congruence theorems to write more proofs. They consider special quadrilaterals, the diagonals of quadrilaterals, and the triangles formed by those diagonals. Students have the opportunity to engage in all aspects of the proof process: generating conjectures, detailing specific statements to be proved, writing a proof, and critiquing a proof. They also encounter the challenge of overlapping triangles.