Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Display for all to see the graphic that illustrates a framework for the Information Gap routine.
Explain that in an Information Gap routine students work with a partner. One partner gets a problem card with a question that doesn’t have enough given information, and the other partner gets a data card with information relevant to the problem card.
The person with the problem card asks questions like “Can you tell me ?” and is expected to explain what they will do with the information. If that person asks for information that is not on the data card (including the answer!) and gives their reason, then the person with the data card must respond with, “I don’t have that information.” The person with the data card should just be providing information, not making assumptions. Note that it is okay to help a stuck partner by saying something like “I don’t have the height of the original cylinder. I only have information about the dimensions of the prism.”
Once the partner with the problem card has enough information, both partners look at the problem card and solve the problem independently.
Arrange students in groups of 2 or 4. If students are new to the Information Gap routine, allowing them to work in groups of 2 for each role supports communication and understanding. In each group, distribute a problem card to one student (or group) and a data card to the other student (or group). After reviewing their work on the first problem, give them the cards for a second problem and instruct them to switch roles.
Your teacher will give you either a problem card or a data card. Do not show or read your card to your partner.
If your teacher gives you the problem card:
Read the data card, and discuss your reasoning.
If your teacher gives you the data card:
The goal is to make sure students understand how scaling a three-dimensional figure impacts length, surface area, and volume. After students have completed their work, share the correct answers, and ask students to discuss the process of solving the problems. Select groups that found Problem Card 2’s answer using the volume formula, and other groups that applied the cubed scale factor to the original cylinder’s volume.
Here are some questions for discussion:
Highlight for students the scale factors of and for lengths, surface areas, and volumes, respectively.
A beverage company manufactures and fills juice cans. The company spends \$0.04 on materials for each can, and fills each can with \$0.27 worth of juice.
The marketing team wants to make a jumbo version of the can that’s a dilated version of the original. They can spend at most \$0.16 on materials for the new can. There’s no restriction on how much they can spend on the juice to fill each can. The team wants to make the new can as large as possible given their budget.
Some students may double the height of the can, but not the radius, in their drawings. Prompt them to verify that their dilated can has the same proportions as their original.
Some students may identify the scale factor as 2 or as 16. Remind them of the relationship between the scale factor for dimensions, , and the scale factor for surface areas, .
The goal is for students to understand that the cylinder is an inexact mathematical model for the real-life can. The model can give insight into the real-world situation. Ask students to share their thoughts on factors that affect the final cost. Invite them to consider whether the original proportions of the can matter (they don’t matter, because the scale factors are the same regardless of the actual shape of the can).