Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Which three go together? Why do they go together?
A
B
C
D
Invite each group to share one reason why a particular set of three go together. Record and display the responses for all to see. After each response, ask the class if they agree or disagree. Since there is no single correct answer to the question of which three go together, attend to students’ explanations and ensure the reasons given are correct.
During the discussion, prompt students to explain the meaning of any terminology they use, such as “terms,” “coefficient,” “combine,” or “distribute” and to clarify their reasoning as needed. Consider asking:
In this activity, students encounter typical errors with signed numbers, operations, and properties. They are tasked with identifying which strategies are correct. For those that are not, students must describe the error that was made.
Since students are contrasting and critiquing different approaches, they are critiquing the reasoning of others (MP3).
Ensure students understand the task: first they decide whether they agree with each person's strategy, but they also need to describe the errors that were made. Give 5 minutes quiet work time followed by a whole-class discussion.
Some students are trying to write an expression with fewer terms that is equivalent to .
Noah says, “I worked the problem from left to right and ended up with .”
Lin says, “I started inside the parentheses and ended up with .”
Jada says, “I used the distributive property and ended up with .”
Andre says, “I also used the distributive property, but I ended up with .”
The purpose of this discussion is to help students recognize some common missteps when rewriting expressions.
Invite students to share the errors they identified in the activity. Point out that since each given work in this activity contains at least two steps, students can use the steps to identify where the error occurs—where the expressions are no longer equal for a value of the variable.
Consider displaying these examples and asking student to explain the error each illustrates:
Review the useful approach of rewriting subtraction operations as adding the opposite. If desired, demonstrate such an approach for the expression along with a box to organize the work of multiplying:
In this partner activity, students take turns making sense of expressions written in different ways. As students trade roles explaining their thinking and listening, they have opportunities to explain their reasoning and critique the reasoning of others (MP3).
Arrange students in groups of 2. Display the task for all to see. Tell students that for each expression in column A, there is an equivalent expression in column B. If time allows, choose a student to be your partner and demonstrate how to set up and do the activity, otherwise share these steps:
Match each expression in column A with an equivalent expression from column B. Be prepared to explain your reasoning.
A
B
For the second and third rows, some students may not understand that the subtraction sign in front of the parentheses applies to both terms inside that set of parentheses. Some students may get the second row correct, but not realize how the third row relates to the fact that the product of two negative numbers is a positive number. For the last three rows, some students may not recognize the importance of the subtraction sign in front of . Prompt them to rewrite the expressions replacing subtraction with adding the inverse.
Students might write an expression with fewer terms but not recognize an equivalent form because the distributive property has been used to write a sum as a product. For example, can be written as or , which is equivalent to the expression in column B. Encourage students to think about writing the column B expressions in a different form and to recall that the distributive property can be applied to either factor or expand an expression.
Much discussion takes place between partners. Invite students to share how they used properties to generate equivalent expressions and find matches.
Optional
In this activity, students continue the work of generating equivalent expressions as they decide where to place a set of parentheses and explore how that placement affects the expressions. As students consider the differences in applying the order of operations based on the placement of parenthesis, they notice and make use of structure (MP7).
Arrange students in groups of 2. Tell students to first complete both questions independently. Then trade one of their expressions with their partner. The partner’s job is to decide whether the new expression is equivalent to the original or not, and explain how they know.
A question on a math quiz had the expression . The teacher told the class there was a typo and the expression was supposed to have one set of parentheses in it.
Students may not realize that they can break up a term like and place a parentheses, such as . Clarify that they may place the parentheses anywhere in the expression.
Invite a few students to share their strategy for placing parentheses to create an equivalent expression, and then an expression that is not equivalent. Because of the subtracted terms, there are limited options for creating an equivalent expression, but lots of possibilities for creating an expression that is not equivalent.
Share with students, “Today we looked at expressions with parentheses and wrote equivalent expressions with fewer terms.”
If desired, use this example to review these concepts. Display the expression for all to see. Ask:
When we combine like terms, we add terms that are numbers or terms that have the same variable. Combining like terms allows us to write expressions more simply with fewer terms.
Examples:
Sometimes it is helpful to be aware of common errors so that we can try to avoid them.
Examples:
Thinking about the meaning of expressions and the properties of operations when rewriting expressions helps us make sure that the value of the expression does not change and the new expression is equivalent.