Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Evaluate mentally.
Is equivalent to ? Support your answer:
With a diagram:
Without a diagram:
Each row has a pair of equivalent expressions.
Complete the table.
If you get stuck, consider drawing a diagram. (Heads up: One of them is impossible.)
| factored form | standard form |
|---|---|
Sometimes expressions in standard form don’t have a linear term. Can they still be written in factored form?
Let’s take as an example. To help us write it in factored form, we can think of it as having a linear term with a coefficient of 0: .
We know that we need to find two numbers that multiply to make -9 and add up to 0. The numbers 3 and -3 meet both requirements, so the factored form is .
To check that this expression is indeed equivalent to , we can expand the factored expression by applying the distributive property: . Adding and gives 0, so the expanded expression is .
In general, a quadratic expression that is a difference of two squares and has the form can be rewritten as .
Here is a more complicated example: . This expression can be written as , so an equivalent expression in factored form is .
What about ? Can it be written in factored form?
Let’s think about this expression as . Can we find two numbers that multiply to make 9 and add up to 0? Here are factors of 9 and their sums:
For two numbers to add up to 0, they need to be opposites (a negative and a positive), but a pair of opposites cannot multiply to make positive 9, because multiplying a negative number and a positive number always gives a negative product.
Because there are no numbers that multiply to make 9 and also add up to 0, it is not possible to write in factored form using the kinds of numbers that we know about.