Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Here is a geometric sequence: 16, 24, 36, 54, 81. What is the growth factor?
The table shows two animal populations growing over time.
| years since 1990 | Population A | Population B |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 23,000 | 3,125 |
| 1 | 29,000 | 3,750 |
| 2 | 35,000 | 4,500 |
| 3 | 41,000 | 5,400 |
| 4 | 47,000 | 6,480 |
Define the sequence so that is the number of white squares in Step , and define the sequence so that is the number of black squares in Step .
Some situations can be accurately modeled with geometric sequences, arithmetic sequences, or sequences that are neither geometric nor arithmetic.
For example, here is a pattern of black squares surrounded by white squares, growing in steps.
The number of white squares in each step grows (8, 13, 18, . . .), with 5 more white squares each time. Since the same number of squares is added each time, the number of white squares forms an arithmetic sequence. The definition for the term of , where is the number of white squares in step , is for .
Geometric sequences are involved in situations such as population growth and scaling. For example, the sequence of areas we got when we imagined cutting a piece of paper in half at each step in an earlier lesson.
Many situations lead to sequences that are neither geometric nor arithmetic. For example, consider this pattern of dots in which a new row of dots introduced in each step:
The number of dots in each step grows (1, 3, 6, 10, . . .), but there is no constant being multiplied or added to get from term to term. If we create a graph of this sequence showing the number of dots as a function of the step number, the dots would form neither a linear nor an exponential shape. This sequence is neither geometric nor arithmetic, but it does have a pattern that we can define with an equation.