Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Tell us about a typo, a broken link, or an improvement you’d like to see. We read every submission but can’t reply.
Have a question or need support instead? Visit our Contact Us page to reach our team.
Loading...
Learn how to use instructional routines to facilitate problem-based learning!
None
This task contains two distinct parts. Depending on what students need and time constraints, you could decide to do either or both.
In the associated Algebra 1 lesson, students will need to evaluate the functions
The purpose of the second part is to revisit ways to tell whether a function is linear, quadratic, or exponential, and to practice the skills of generating a table and sketching a graph for a given function.
| Noah’s work | Mai’s work | corrected work | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate |
30 |
7,776 |
|
| Evaluate |
36 |
324 |
| -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Loading...
The goal of this discussion is to analyze and correct the mistakes in addition to clarifying the differences between linear, exponential, and quadratic functions.
For the first part, use Critique, Correct, Clarify to give students an opportunity to improve a sample written response to the incorrect solutions by correcting errors, clarifying meaning, and adding details.
For the second part, display the tables and graphs for all to see. Ask students to share some ways they can tell a function is linear, exponential, or quadratic using the different representations. For example:
None
This practice activity is an opportunity to develop fluency in evaluating expressions that involve exponents using the conventional order, which will be useful in the associated Algebra 1 lesson when students generate tables of values for functions defined by such expressions. Encourage students to evaluate the expressions without using a calculator in order to practice mental math. The structure of a row game gives students an opportunity to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3).
Arrange students in groups of 2, assigning one student as partner A and the other as partner B. Explain to students that there are two columns of problems, and that they only do the problems in their column. They should pause after each row to see if their answers match, and if not, work together to resolve any errors.
For each row, you and your partner will each evaluate an expression. You should each get the same answer in each row. If you disagree, work to reach an agreement.
| row | Partner A | Partner B |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
Loading...
The goal is to allow students to practice solving expressions involving exponents. Much of the discussion will happen between partners. These expressions were chosen to highlight errors that people commonly make evaluating expressions. Here are a few specific conventions to draw students’ attention to:
Additionally, this may be a good opportunity to revisit mentally evaluating expressions that involve a fraction, for example:
to access Student Response.
to access Student Response.
to access Student Response.