Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Decide whether each statement is true or false.
Han is solving three equations by graphing.
To solve the first equation, , he graphs , and then looks for the -intercepts of the graph.
To solve the second equation, Han rewrites it as . He then graphs .
Use graphing technology to graph . Then, use the graph to solve the equation. Be prepared to explain how you use the graph for solving.Think about the strategy you used and the solutions you found.
Solve each equation. Be prepared to explain or show your reasoning.
Consider . Priya reasons that if this is true, then either or . So, the solutions to the original equation are 12 and 6.
Do you agree? If not, where was the mistake in Priya’s reasoning?
Consider . Diego says to solve we can just divide each side by to get , so the solution is 10. Mai says, “I wrote the expression on the left in factored form, which gives , and ended up with two solutions: 0 and 10.”
Do you agree with either strategy? Explain your reasoning.
Quadratic equations can have two, one, or no solutions.
We can find out how many solutions a quadratic equation has and what the solutions are by rearranging the equation into the form of an equation with one side equal to 0, graphing the function that the expression defines, and determining its zeros. Here are some examples.
Let's first subtract from each side and rewrite the equation as . We can think of solving this equation as finding the zeros of a function defined by .
If the output of this function is , we can graph and identify where the graph intersects the -axis, or where the -coordinate is 0.
From the graph, we can see that the -intercepts are and , so equals 0 when is 0 and when is 5.
The graph readily shows that there are two solutions to the equation.
Note that the equation can be solved without graphing, but we need to be careful not to divide both sides by . Doing so will give us but will show no trace of the other solution, !
Even though dividing both sides by the same value is usually acceptable for solving equations, we avoid dividing by the same variable because it may eliminate a solution.
Let’s rewrite the equation as and consider it to represent a function defined by and whose output, , is 0.
Let's graph and identify the -intercepts.
The graph shows one -intercept at . This tells us that the function defined by has only one zero.
It also means that the equation is true only when . The value 5 is the only solution to the equation.
Rearranging the equation gives .
Let’s graph and find the -intercepts.
The graph does not intersect the -axis, so there are no -intercepts.
This means there are no -values that can make the expression equal 0, so the function defined by has no zeros.
The equation has no solutions.
We can see that this is the case even without graphing. is . Because no number can be squared to get a negative value, the equation has no solutions.
Earlier you learned that graphing is not always reliable for showing precise solutions. This is still true here. The -intercepts of a graph are not always whole-number values. While they can give us an idea of how many solutions there are and what the values may be (at least approximately), for exact solutions we still need to rely on algebraic ways of solving.