Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
If is a point on the plane and is a point on the plane, then is congruent to .
Try to prove this claim by explaining why you can be certain the claim must be true, or try to disprove this claim by explaining why the claim cannot be true. If you can find a counterexample in which the “if” part (hypothesis) is true, but the “then” part (conclusion) is false, you have disproved the claim.
Prove the conjecture: If is a segment in the plane and is a segment in the plane with the same length as , then is congruent to .
If two figures are congruent, then there is a sequence of rigid motions that takes one figure onto the other. We can use this fact to prove that any point is congruent to another point. We can also prove segments of the same length are congruent. Finally, we can put together arguments to prove entire figures are congruent.
These statements prove is congruent to .
Segments and are the same length, so they are congruent. Therefore, there is a rigid motion that takes to . Apply that rigid motion to figure .
If necessary, reflect the image of figure across to be sure the image of , which we will call , is on the same side of as .
must be on ray since both and are on the same side of and make the same angle with it at .
Since points and are the same distance along the same ray from , they have to be in the same place.
Therefore, figure is congruent to figure .