Not all roles available for this page.
Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Highlight each piece of given information that is used in the proof, and highlight each line in the proof where that piece of information is used.
Given:
Proof:
Segments and are the same length, so they are congruent. Therefore, there is a rigid motion that takes to .
Apply that rigid motion to triangle . The image of will coincide with , and the image of will coincide with .
We cannot be sure that the image of coincides with yet. If necessary, reflect the image of triangle across to be sure the image of , which we will call , is on the same side of as . (This reflection does not change the image of or .)
We know the image of angle is congruent to angle because rigid motions don’t change the size of angles.
must be on ray since both and are on the same side of , and make the same angle with it at .
Segment is the image of , and rigid motions preserve distance, so they must have the same length.
We also know has the same length as . So and must be the same length.
Since and are the same distance along the same ray from , they have to be in the same place.
We have shown that a rigid motion takes to , to , and to ; therefore, triangle is congruent to triangle .
Mai and Kiran want to prove that in an isosceles triangle, the two base angles are congruent. Finish the proof that they started. Draw the auxiliary line, and define it so that you can use the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem to complete each statement in the proof.
Draw .
Segment is congruent to segment because of the definition of isosceles triangle.
Angle is congruent to angle because .
Segment is congruent to itself.
Therefore, triangle is congruent to triangle by the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem.
Therefore, .
If all pairs of corresponding sides and angles in two triangles are congruent, then it is possible to find a rigid transformation that takes corresponding vertices onto one another. This proves that if two triangles have all pairs of corresponding sides and angles congruent, then the triangles must be congruent. But justifying that the vertices must line up does not require knowing all the pairs of corresponding sides and angles are congruent. We can justify that the triangles must be congruent if all we know is that two pairs of corresponding sides and the pair of corresponding angles between the sides are congruent. This is called the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem.
To find out if two triangles, or two parts of triangles, are congruent, see if the given information or the diagram indicates that 2 pairs of corresponding sides and the pair of corresponding angles between the sides are congruent. If that is the case, we don’t need to show and justify all the transformations that take one triangle onto the other triangle. Instead, we can explain how we know the pairs of corresponding sides and angles are congruent and say that the two triangles must be congruent because of the Side-Angle-Side Triangle Congruence Theorem.
Sometimes, to find congruent triangles, we may need to add more lines to the diagram. We can decide what properties those lines have based on how we construct the lines (An angle bisector? A perpendicular bisector? A line connecting two given points?). Mathematicians call these additional lines auxiliary lines because auxiliary means “providing additional help or support.” These are lines that give us extra help in seeing hidden triangle structures.
An auxiliary line is an extra line drawn on a figure to show hidden structure.