Sign in to view assessments and invite other educators
Sign in using your existing Kendall Hunt account. If you don’t have one, create an educator account.
Lin wrote a proof to show that diagonal \(EG\) is a line of symmetry for rhombus \(EFGH\). Fill in the blanks to complete her proof.
Because \(EFGH\) is a rhombus, the distance from \(E\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}1\hspace{.5in}}\) is the same as the distance from \(E\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}2\hspace{.5in}}\). Since \(E\) is the same distance from \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}3\hspace{.5in}}\) as it is from \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}4\hspace{.5in}}\), it must lie on the perpendicular bisector of segment \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}5\hspace{.5in}}\). By the same reasoning, \(G\) must lie on the perpendicular bisector of \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}6\hspace{.5in}}\). Therefore, line \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}7\hspace{.5in}}\) is the perpendicular bisector of segment \(FH\). So reflecting rhombus \(EFGH\) across line \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}8\hspace{.5in}}\) will take \(E\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}9\hspace{.5in}}\) and \(G\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}10\hspace{.5in}}\) (because \(E\) and \(G\) are on the line of reflection) and \(F\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}11\hspace{.5in}}\)and \(H\) to \(\underline{\hspace{.5in}12\hspace{.5in}}\) (since \(FH\) is perpendicular to the line of reflection, and \(F\) and \(H\) are the same distance from the line of reflection, on opposite sides). Since the image of rhombus \(EFGH\) reflected across \(EG\) is rhombus \(EHGF\) (the same rhombus!), line \(EG\) must be a line of symmetry for rhombus \(EFGH\).